SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF PUNJAB – Appellant
Versus
GURMIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
['A G PUNJAB', 'R S SHARMA', 'DHEERAJ SHARMA', '']

RSA No. 2434 of 1990 (O&M)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

RSA No. 2434 of 1990 (O&M)

Date of Decision 24.9.2014

The State of Punjab through the Secretary to Government of Punjab,

Transport Department

....Appellant

Versus

Gurmit Singh

....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK

Present: Mr. L.S.Virk, Additional A.G. Punjab.

None for the respondents.

***

1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

***

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.

(Oral)

It is defendant's second appeal, against the concurrent

findings of facts recorded by both the learned courts below, whereby

suit for declaration filed by the plaintiff, was decreed.

Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the learned first

appellate court in para 2 and 3 of the impugned judgment, are that

plaintiff-respondent Gurmit Singh instituted a suit for declaration to

the effect that the order No. 8228-32/ST (GM) dated 16.7.1987,

passed by the General Manager, Punjab Roadways, Depot No.2

Jalandhar whereby the plaintiff was removed from services

AMIT KUMAR

2014.10.01 14:12

I attest to the accuracy and

authe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top