SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
S.P.S. RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent


Advocates:
['ABHA RATHORE', 'AMIT DHAWAN', 'PANKAJ BHARDWAJ', '']

Crl. Revision No.1558 of 2010 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Crl. Revision No.1558 of 2010 (O&M)

Date of decision: 01.09.2010

S.P.S. Rathore

…Petitioner

Versus

Central Bureau of Investigation

…Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

Present: Mrs. Abha Rathore, Advocate with

Ms. Priyanjali, Advocate for the petitioner.

Dr.Anmol Rattan Sidhu, Sr Standing counsel for the CBI with

Mr. Ajay Kaushik, Advocate.

Mr. Pankaj Bhardwaj, Advocate with

Ms. Anju Sharma, Advocate,

for the complainant.

JITENDRA CHAUHAN, J.

Criminal Miscellaneous no. 29590 of 2010

For the reasons mentioned in the main judgment as well as the grounds taken

Crl. Revision No.1558 of 2010 (O&M) 2

in the application, prayer of the complainant Mrs. Madhu Parkas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top