HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent
217
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12856-2020 (O&M)
Date of decision : 22.09.2020
Krishan Kumar Malik
&Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
&Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present:
Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, for
Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
Mr. Puneet Jindal, Sr. Advocate, with
Mr. Tajinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Heard through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, states that
the present petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the
petitioner has since been reinstated subject to the outcome of the enquiry
proceedings. She further states that the petitioner be given liberty to avail
his legal remedies in accordance with law once the enquiry proceedings
are concluded.
Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of
respondent Nos.3 and 4, has also reiterated that the petitioner has since
been reinstated subject to the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings
pending against him.
In view of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.