SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
KRISHAN KUMAR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS – Respondent


217

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CWP-12856-2020 (O&M)

Date of decision : 22.09.2020

Krishan Kumar Malik

&Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

&Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present:

Ms. Ridhi Bansal, Advocate, for

Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Moudgil, Addl. A.G. Haryana.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Sr. Advocate, with

Mr. Tajinder Singh, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 3 and 4.

ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)

Heard through Video Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, states that

the present petition has been rendered infructuous inasmuch as the

petitioner has since been reinstated subject to the outcome of the enquiry

proceedings. She further states that the petitioner be given liberty to avail

his legal remedies in accordance with law once the enquiry proceedings

are concluded.

Mr. Puneet Jindal, Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of

respondent Nos.3 and 4, has also reiterated that the petitioner has since

been reinstated subject to the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings

pending against him.

In view of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top