SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUBE SINGH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA & ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Civil Writ Petition No.3217 of 2014

Date of Decision: February 20, 2014

Sube Singh and others

.....Petitioners

versus

State of Haryana and others

.....Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH.

----

Present : Mr.Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

-.-

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

2.To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

---

Surya Kant, J. (Oral)

The petitioners seek a direction to the respondent-

authorities for allotment of plot under the 'Oustees quota'. It

is averred that their land measuring 7 kanal 18 marlas

comprised in Khasra No.19//9/2 (4-4), 20//13/3 (3-14), situated

within the revenue estate of village Fatehpur and Adampur

District Gurgaon, was acquired by the State for a public

purpose way back in the year 2005-2006 for the development

of Sectors-49 & 50 in urban estate, Gurgaon. The petitioners

submit that in terms of the Government policies issued from

time to time, they fall in the category of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top