SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MADAN MOHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
['CHARANJEET KAUR', 'ASTT S G', 'C S C', 'NARESH PANT']

WPMS No. 2378 of 2019

with

WPMS No. 2379 of 2019

WPMS No. 2380 of 2019

Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.

Ms. Charanjeet Kaur, learned counsel

for the petitioners.

Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Additional

C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, learned Central

Government Standing Counsel for the Union

of India.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since common questions of law and fact

are involved in these writ petitions, therefore

are being taken up together and are being

adjudicated by this common judgment.

However, for the sake of clarity, facts of

WPMS

No.

2378

of

2019

are

being

considered.

By

means

of

this

writ

petition,

petitioner has sought following relief:-

“Issue a writ or writs, order or orders, direction

or directions particularly to issue a writ of

certiorari to call for the record of the case and to

quash the impugned joint inspection report

dated 21.05.2018 by which the respondents

had unlawfully declared the land in question as

State Government’s land that

to without

considering the fact that said land belongs to

petitioner and falls in Khasra No. 184/2 which

has already been notified for acquisiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top