SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM PRAKASH @ RAM PRAKASH CHAUDHARI – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['DILEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA', 'G A', '', 'M J AKHTAR']

Court No. - 88

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6585 of 2021

Applicant :- Ram Prakash @ Ram Prakash Chaudhari

Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another

Counsel for Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Srivastava

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,M J Akhtar

Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.

Heard Sri Dileep Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the

applicant, Sri M.J. Akhtar, learned counsel for opposite party

no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the

record.

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant

for quashing the cognizance order dated 06.1.2021 passed by

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar at Padarauna as well as

entire proceedings of Case No.189 of 2021 (State Vs. Ram

Prakash) arising out of Case Crime No.124 of 2020, under

Sections 147, 323, 325, 504, 506, 452, 188, 269, 308 IPC and

section 51 (b) Disaster Management Act, Police Station

Khadda, District Kushinagar pending in the court of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar at Padaurana.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that

impugned cognizance/summoning order has been passed on a

printed proforma by filling the blanks and it has been passed

withou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top