ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
RABI PRAKASH @ CHANDAN – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12583 of 2019
Applicant :- Rabi Prakash @ Chandan
Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Achyut Jee,Sanjay Kumar,Yogesh Kumar Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay
Singh, learned A.G.A.-I appearing for the State.
This is the third bail application moved on behalf of the applicant. The first & second
bail application moved on behalf of the applicant was rejected vide orders dated
7.1.2016 and 1.9.2017.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has
been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.
The new ground which has been taken by the learned counsel for the applicant is
that while rejecting the first bail application another Bench of this Court had directed
the trial Court to conclude the trial preferably within a period of eight months from the
date of receipt of certified copy of the order, but till date trial of the case is not
concluded. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the
allegations ma
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.