SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
CONSUMER CASE NO. 1035 OF 2015
 
1. RAHUL PANDE RAO
(THROUGH NANDITA RAO) T-7/16, DLF PHASE-III,
GURGAON, HARYANA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus 
1. M/S. UNITECH LIMITED
(THROUGH ITS M.D.) THE REAL ESTATE MARKETING DIVISION, 6, COMMUNITY CENTRE,
SAKET, NEW DELHI-110017.
...........Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN,PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Complainant :
Mr. Sudhir Mahajan, Advocate
For the Opp.Party :
Mr. Sahil Sachdeva, Advocate

Dated : 19 Aug 2016
ORDER

JUSTICE V.K. JAIN (ORAL)

CC/498/2015  (seeking possession + compensation)

The complainant, namely, Sunil Kumar Sawhney booked a residential flat No.1701 with the opposite party in the aforesaid  project, for a total consideration of Rs.10436315/- and a Buyers Agreement between the parties was  executed on 15.11.2007. The possession to the allottee was to be delivered by 15.11.2010. Since possession has not been offered to him, he is before this Commission seeking possession of the flat allotted to him along with compensation for the delay in offering possession.

CC/499/2015 (seeking possession + compensation)

The complainant, namely, Nandita Das booked

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top