SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HARJIT SINGH BEDI,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
CHATTI KONATI RAO – Appellant
Versus
PALLE VENKATA SUBBA RAO – Respondent
C.A. No.-006039-006039 / 2003
07-12-2010
V. G. PRAGASAMNEERU VAID
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6039 OF 2003
Chatti Konati Rao & Ors.
…. Appellants
Versus
Palle Venkata Subba Rao
…. Respondent
J U D G M E N T
CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, J.
1.
Plaintiff No. 1 is the son of plaintiff No. 2, whereas
original defendant Nos. 1 and 2 were brother and sister of the
second plaintiff. Both the defendants died during the
pendency of the suit. The heirs and legal representatives of the
first defendant were substituted in his place and they had
contested the suit.
2.
Plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of possession in respect
of several properties mentioned in schedule of the plaint and
in the present appeal we are concerned with Schedule – I
property i.e. four acres of land pertaining to R.S. No. 44/3
situate at village Vijjeswaram, hereinafter referred to as the
land in dispute.
3.
According to the plaintiffs their predecessor-in-interest
viz., one Venkata Ramana Rao, who happened to be the father
of plaintiff No. 1 and husband of plaintiff No. 2, was the owner
of land in dispute. Venkata Ramana Rao was a Government
employee and in his absence defendant No. 1 i.e. elder brother
of second plaintiff used to look after his property. Said
Venkata Ramana Rao died in the year 1948 and thereafter the
plaintiffs came back to the village and started looking after the
agricultural land including the land in dispute. Plaintiff’s case
further is that again in the year 1954 they shifted their
residence to Kakinada for education of the first plaintiff and
defendant No. 1 was asked to look after the land in dispute.
In the year 1974 when the defendant declined to deliver
2
possession of the land in dispute, lawyer’s notice dated 6th
April, 1974 was issued calling upon the defendants to hand
over the property. Defendant No. 1 responded to the notice by
his letter dated 27th May, 1974 denying the title of the
plaintiffs and claiming himself to be the owner of the property.
Plaintiffs thereafter filed the suit bearing O.S. No. 20 of 1974
in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, West Godavari District,
Kovvur for recovery of possession in respect of land in dispute
and for mesne profit.
4.
In the written statement filed by defendant No. 1 his plea
was that he purchased the land in dispute under a stamped
agreement from Venkata Ramana Rao for a value of
Rs.1600/-. According to him he paid Rs.1,000/- to Venkata
Ramana Rao and a sum of Rs.225/- to one Bombothu
Chitteyya who was the tenant and in possession of the land in
dispute during 1943 and said tenant vide letter dated 16th
June, 1943 relinquished his possession and delivered the land
to defendant No. 1. It is further case of defendant No. 1 that
balance amount of Rs.400/- was sent by Money Order. After
3
the death of Venkata Ramana Rao, the second plaintiff
claimed more money towards the sale of the land in dispute
and plaintiff No. 2 being the sister of defendant No. 1, a
further sum of Rs.500/- was paid to her vide receipt dated 14th
January, 1952 (Exh.B-4).
5.
Plea of defendant No. 1 further is that on 6th November,
1960 he filed an application before the Assistant Settlement
Officer for correction of rough patta issued in favour of second
plaintiff in 1959 and to substitute his name along with his
brother’s name in place of second plaintiff. In the application
defendant No. 1 categorically stated that on 18th February,
1954 the Settlement Officer directed issuance of patta of the
land in dispute along with other lands in their favour and he
was all through waiting for the issuance of patta. However,
according to defendant No. 1, in August, 1959 he came to
know that a rough patta was issued to second plaintiff
contrary to the decision of the Settlement Officer and
thereafter he filed a