SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CANARA BANK – Appellant
Versus
G. RAJ – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-007027 / 2022 02-05-2022



Advocates:
RAJESH KUMAR GAUTAM

ITEM NO.3 COURT NO.16 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 7027/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 25-01-2022

in AS No. 279/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at

Madras)

CANARA BANK & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

G. RAJ Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.56770/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING

O.T. )

Date : 02-05-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, AOR

Mr. Anant Gautam, Adv.

Nipun Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned

judgment and hence, the petition for special leave to

appeal is dismissed. However, we make it clear that we

have not commented as to whether the petitioner-bank would

be entitled to set off Rs. 4,33,171.91 from the decreed

amount. We are not commenting on the said aspect except

noting that the petitioners would be entitled to raise

such contention and any such contention, if raised, would

be examined by the trial court in accordance with law.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed

of.

(SONIA BHASIN) (DIPTI KHURANA)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

Digitally signed by

SONIA BHASIN

Date: 2022.05.04

17:02:36 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top