SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RANJAN GOGOI,ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
ASSOCIATE BUILDERS – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
AMBAR QAMARUDDINBINU TAMTA

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10531 OF 2014

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NO.14767 OF 2012)

Associate Builders …Appellant

Versus

Delhi Development Authority …Respondent

J U D G M E N T

R.F.Nariman,J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

The appellant herein was awarded a certain construction work contract

by the DDA vide a letter of award dated 14th May, 1992. DDA was building a

colony consisting of 7,000 houses in Trilok Puri in the trans-Yamuna area. 168

Middle Income Group houses and 56 Lower Income Group houses, Grade-A

Pocket- B (balance work) was awarded for the tendered amount of

Rs.87,66,678/-. The contract was to be completed in 9 months. Admittedly, it

was ultimately completed only in 34 months, the contractor completing 166

Middle Income Group houses and 36 Lower Income Group houses. The total

value of work that was done amounted to Rs.62,84,845/-. As many as 15

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

claims were made by the contractor and the High Court of Delhi appointed one

Shri K.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top