SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
YOGESH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHABEER SINGH . – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-001482-001482 / 2013
20-10-2016
ADITYA SINGH(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA
1
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1482 OF 2013
YOGESH SINGH
…
APPELLANT(S)
:Versus:
MAHABEER SINGH & ORS.
…
RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
Pinaki Chandra Ghose, J.
1.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and order
dated 17th February, 2012 passed by the High Court of
Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.1734 of 1983,
whereby the High Court acquitted the accused persons –
respondents herein of the charges under Section 302 read with
Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that on 26.06.1982 at about
8.00 A.M., the deceased Mohan Singh, who was a resident of
Village Garh Umrao, Tehsil Sadabad, District Mathura, U.P.,
after taking bath at the tube-well, was going to his house along
with his minor daughter Lajjawati (PW-5). He was carrying his
single barrel gun and the strip of cartridges with him. The
respondents Phal Singh and Mahabir Singh, along with other
accused Om Prakash and Gopi Chand, were clearing the
Digitally signed by
SONALI SAUND
Date: 2016.10.21
16:05:21 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
irrigation channel of their field; whereas respondents Raj Pal and
Satya Pal were scrapping grass in their respective fields. Jaipal
Singh and Om Prakash were engaged in plucking the Moong
Pods from the field. When deceased Mohan Singh reached the
ridge of the field of Om Prakash and Gopi Chand, Phal Singh
and Jaipal Singh caught him by his hands whereas respondent
Om Prakash came from behind, put his arm around him and put
him down on the ground. In the meantime, other accused
persons also reached there. Then the accused Jaipal and Om
Prakash caught hands of the deceased and accused Rajpal and
Satyapal caught the legs of the deceased. Rajpal hit the deceased
with a Ballam. Accused Mahabir Singh and Phal Singh severed
the head of the deceased Mohan Singh by hitting him with
Phawara (Spade).
3.
At the time of the incident, Kalyan Singh (PW-1), who is the
father of deceased Mohan Singh, and Bani Singh (PW-2) were
sitting at the tube well of Bani Singh situated at a distance of
around 150 yards from the place of incident. On hearing the
cries of deceased Mohan Singh and Lajjawati (PW-5), the
aforesaid witnesses rushed to the place of incident. In the
meantime, accused Harcharan also arrived at the place of
3
incident carrying his gun. In order to dissuade Kalyan Singh and
Bani Singh, the accused respondents Phal Singh and Harcharan
fired in the air. Then the accused persons tried to take away the
body of deceased Mohan Singh by dragging it for some distance.
But due to the hue and cry raised by the eye-witnesses, the
accused fled away from the place of incident. Thereafter, Kalyan
Singh (PW-1) went to Police Station Sadabad with a written
complaint of the incident, on the basis of which an FIR of the
incident was lodged on the same day at around 11.00 A.M. and
Case Crime No.139 of 1982 was registered.
4.
Thereafter, investigation started and police sent the dead
body of Mohan Singh for post-mortem, prepared Site Map of the
place of the incident, and collected blood-stained soil and clothes
of the deceased. In the evening, accused Harcharan was arrested
and on the information given by him, a blood-stained Phawara
(Spade) was recovered. All the articles recovered were sent for
chemical examination.
5.
Dr. K.C. Jain (PW-4) conduced the post-mortem
examination of deceased Mohan Singh which disclosed that there
were three ante mortem injuries present on the corpse of Mohan
Singh; head was severed from the body; and there was fracture
4
on 6th and 7th vertebra. The doctor opined that the death was
caused due to shock and hemorrhage due to above stated
injuries.
6.
After the investigation was complete, seven persons,
namely, Mahabir Singh, Phal Singh, Jaipal Singh, Om Prakash,
Raj P