SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
ANOOP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
MISHRA SAURABHRAJEEV KUMAR BANSAL

ITEM NO.109 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Criminal Appeal No(s). 1505/2010

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Appellant(s)

VERSUS

ANOOP SINGH Respondent(s)

Date : 19-07-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Arjun Garg,Adv.

Mr. Manish Yadav,Adv.

Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Bansal, AOR

Mr.Maneesh Pathak,Adv.

Mr.Brahma Prakash,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed in terms of the

signed order.

(MADHU BALA) (VEENA KHERA)

COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Signed order is placed on the file)

Digitally signed by

MADHU BALA

Date: 2017.07.22

11:33:51 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELL

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top