SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

H.S.GOUTHAM – Appellant
Versus
RAMA MURTHY AND ANR. ETC. – Respondent


Advocates:
BHARTI TYAGIP. R. RAMASESH

ORDER

Civil Appeal No.1844/2010 The office report is that the Ld.counsel for the parties have already filed the statement of case. Viewed in that context, the matter, shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court on its own turn. Civil Appeal No.1845/2010 The office report indicates that the Ld.counsel for the appellants has already filed the statement of case. The office …...2 Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2015.05.01 11:23:31 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified ITEM NO.88 -2- report further is that the Ld.counsel for the respondents has failed to file the statement of case although he has been notified to do so by letter dated 15.02.2012 of this Registry. Order XIX Rule 32 of the Supreme Court Rules,2013 provides that if the respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge the same. respondent has entered appearance and does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided in Sub Rule(1) (i.e. 35 days) it shall be presumed that he does not desire to lodge

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top