SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RANGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
SRI MOHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
V. N. RAGHUPATHY

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1020 OF 2010

[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 407 of 2006]

Rangappa

… Appellant

Versus

Sri Mohan … Respondent

J U D G M E N T

K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.I.

1. Leave granted.

2. In the present case, the trial court had acquitted the

appellant-accused in a case related to the dishonour of a

cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,

1881 [Hereinafter ‘Act’]. This finding of acquittal had been

made by the Addl. JMFC at Ranebennur, Karnataka in

Criminal Case No. 993/2001, by way of a judgment dated

30-5-2005. On appeal by the respondent-complainant, the

High Court had reversed the trial court’s decision and

1

recorded a finding of conviction while directing that the

appellant-accused should pay a fine of Rs. 75,000, failing

which he would have to undergo three months simple

imprisonment (S.I.). Aggrieved by this final order passed by the

High Court of Karnataka [in Criminal Appeal No. 1367/2005]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top