SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.M. LODHA,ANIL R. DAVE,RANJAN GOGOI
DEEPAK AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KESHAV KAUSHIK . – Respondent


Advocates:
PRASHANT BHUSHAN

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 17463 of 2010)

Deepak Aggarwal

…… Appellant

Vs.

Keshav Kaushik and others

…… Respondents

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 562-567 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17723-17728 of 2010)

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 568-572 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17793-17797 of 2010)

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 573-578 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17366-17371 of 2010)

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 579-584 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 21344-21349 of 2010)

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 585-590 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 23205-23210 of 2010)

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 591-596 OF 2013

(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 32273-32278 of 2011)

JUDGMENT

R.M. LODHA, J.

Leave granted. What is the meaning of the expression ‘the

service’ in Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India? What is meant by

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

‘advocate’ or ‘pleader’ under Article 233(2)? Whether a District

Attorney/Additional District Attorney/Public Prosecutor/Assistant Public

Prosecutor/Assistant Advocate General, who is full time employ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top