SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAYENDRA VISHNU THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
BRIJ BHUSHANRAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 981 OF 2009

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 6374 of 2007)

Jayendra Vishnu Thakur

…. Appellant

Versus

State of Maharahstra and another

…. Respondents

J U D G M E N T

S.B. SINHA, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

Interpretation of the provisions of Section 299 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’), Section 33 of the Indian

Evidence Act, 1871 as also Section 14(5) of the Terrorist and Disruptive

Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short ‘the TADA’) is involved in this

appeal which arises out of a common order dated 6th March, 2007 passed by

the Designated Court (TADA), Pune, in Application Exh. 1118 and 1227 in

TSC No. 2/1996, 1/1997and 2/1997.

3.

The said question arises in the following fact situation.

One Suresh Narsinh Dube was shot dead at Nallasopara Railway

Station in the suburbs of Mumbai on 9th October, 1989. The impleaded

respondent herein, the brother of the deceased, filed a complaint petition

with regard to the incident. Appellant absconded.

A proclamation under Section 82 of the Code was thereafter issued on

9th February, 1993 decl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top