GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
BALBIR SINGH – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 4
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 7173 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Ghaziabad Development Authority
RESPONDENT:
Balbir Singh
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/12/2004
BENCH:
H.K. SEMA & TARUN CHATTERJEE
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
O R D E R
Heard the parties.
This appeal is directed against the judgment and award passed by the
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (in short ‘the
Commission’) awarding interest @ 18% per annum. In view of the order
that we propose to pass, necessary facts leading to the filing of the present
appeal are obviated. In fact, the appellant has deposited/paid the entire
amount of 18% interest and in that view of the matter the appeal is virtually
rendered infructuous in view of the order rendered by this Court in
Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh (2004) 5 SCC 65:
24. "We clarify that in all cases where interest has already
been paid @ 18% irrespective of the above order, the
authority will not be entitled to call upon the party to
refund the amount which has already been paid."
This Court after threadbare consideration of the submissions in Balbir
Singh’s case (supra) in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.