SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M/S. MANDVI CO-OP BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
NIMESH B.THAKORE – Respondent


Advocates:
JATIN ZAVERI

REPORTABLE

THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2010

[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3915/2006]

M/S. MANDVI CO-OP BANK LTD.

……….Appellant

VERSUS

NIMESH B. THAKORE

……….Respondent

W I T H

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S)._______OF 2010

[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No(s). 4760/2006, 5689/2006, 1106/2007,

6442/2007, 6443/2007 and 6703/2007]

J U D G M E N T

AFTAB ALAM, J.

1.

Leave granted

2.

In these appeals we are required to consider the special provisions laid

down by section 145 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (‘the Act’,

1

hereinafter) for a dishonoured cheque trial and to consider how far certain

assertions made by the accused are in accordance with the provisions

contained in the two sub-sections of that section.

3.

The High Court had before it a large number of writ petitions and

applications under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Most of

those petitions were filed on behalf of the accused but a few were also at the

instance of the complainants. On the basis of the grievances made and reliefs

prayed for in those petitions the High Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top