SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M/S. SUPERTECH LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RAJNI GOYAL – Respondent
C.A. No.-006649-006650 / 2018 11-07-2018



Advocates:
T. MAHIPAL

ITEM NO.20 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 21773/2018

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-03-2018

in RA No. 94/2018 07-02-2018 in CC No. 708/2017 passed by the

National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi)

M/S. SUPERTECH LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAJNI GOYAL Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.82969/2018-STAY APPLICATION and IA

No.82968/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL)

Date : 11-07-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Petitioner(s)

Mr.T.Mahipal, AOR

Mr.Amar Dave, Adv.

Ms.Shubnam Agarwal, Adv.

Mr.Anshuman Srivastava, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr.Ashwarya Sinha, AOR

Ms.Priyanka Sinha, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

Mr.Ashwarya Sinha, learned counsel for the

respondent accepts notice. Therefore, no formal notice

is required to be issued to the respondent.

Let counter affidavit be filed within two weeks.

Rejoinder affidavit, if any, be filed within two

weeks thereafter.

Permission to file additional documents is also

granted to learned counsel for the petitioner.

In the meantime, operation of impugned order shall

remained stayed.

(Ashok Raj Singh) (Chander Bala)

Court Master

Court Master

Digitally signed by

SUSHIL KUMAR

RAKHEJA

Date: 2018.07.11

17:14:39 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top