SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
DILEEP KUMAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
SUSHMA SURI

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2466-67 OF 2015

(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) NOS.25568-25569 OF 2014)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

…APPELLANTS

VERSUS

DILEEP KUMAR SINGH

…RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

R.F.Nariman, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

These appeals raise an interesting question as to the

interpretation of a proviso contained in Section 47 of the Persons

with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full

Participation) Act, 1995 (in short the “1995 Act”).

3.

The facts giving rise to these appeals are as follows:-

On 1st January, 1998, the respondent was enlisted in the CRPF as

Assistant Commandant. While on duty, on 19th October, 2001, he

sustained grievous injuries in his spinal cord and legs while he was

out on a visit checking night guards. Thereafter, he was provided

with specialized treatment in various hospitals, but nothing worked

1

Digitally signed by

Om Parkash Sharma

Date: 2015.02.28

13:27:21 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

and, ultimately, a medical board in its report dated 22nd July, 2004

categorized the respondent as PEE-5, i.e., a person who is

permanently incapacita

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top