SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DNYANDEO SABAJI NAIK – Appellant
Versus
PRADNYA PRAKASH KHADEKAR . – Respondent


Advocates:
BANKEY BIHARI

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 25331-33 OF 2015

DNYANDEO SABAJI NAIK AND ANR

..Petitioners

VERSUS

MRS.PRADNYA PRAKASH KHADEKAR

AND ORS

..Respondents

J U D G M E N T

Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J

1.

The Special Leave Petitions in the present case arise from three orders

of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a First Appeal:

(i) an order dated 22 November 2013 by which a year’s time was granted to the

petitioners (in terms as prayed) to vacate the premises which formed the subject

matter of a decree for eviction, until 30 November 2014;

(ii) an order dated 2 December 2013 by which the High Court disposed of the First

Appeal in terms of the undertaking filed by the petitioners; and

(iii) an order dated 16 June 2015 by which the petition for review has been dismissed.

There is a delay of 503 and 522 days respectively in the Special Leave Petitions filed

against the orders dated 2 December 2013 and 22 November 2013. Since the

petitioners moved the High Court in a petition for review, we condone the delay and

REPORTABLE

Digitally signed by

SATISH KUMAR YADAV

Date: 2017.03.06

13:37:15 TLT

Reason:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top