SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PANDURANG SITARAM JADHAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS DAIRY MANAGER – Respondent


Advocates:
ABHA R. SHARMA

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10064-10075/2010

PANDURANG SITARAM JADHAV ETC.ETC. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

THROUGH ITS DAIRY MANAGER & ANR.

Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No. 1839-1841/2014 (III)

J U D G M E N T

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

1.

We are faced with eleven appeals filed by eleven daily wage

workers of the Regional Dairy at Konkan, Maharashtra who claim

permanency of their status.

2.

The appellants filed complaints before the Industrial Court,

Maharashtra at Kolhapur under Section 28 read with Items 5,6 and 9

of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions &

Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter

referred to as ‘the said Act’) claiming that they had been working

with the respondent for periods more than 240 days continuously

over a long period of time and have not been given regular status.

The status of these complainants is set out in the judgment of the

Tribunal itself and would show the position qua these appellants:

Digitally signed by

MANISH SETHI

Date: 2019.09.30

16:30:29 IST

Reason:

Signature

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top