SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.C. NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
VIKAS MEHTAASHA GOPALAN NAIR

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.73 OF 2007

A.C. NARAYANAN

… APPELLANT

V/s

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

… RESPONDENTS

With

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1437 OF 2013

SHRI G. KAMALAKAR

… APPELLANT

V/s

M/S SURANA SECURITIES LTD. & ANR.

… RESPONDENTS

J U D G M E N T

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J.

As the question of law involved is common in both the

appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common

judgment.

Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2007

2.

Brief facts of the case are as follows:

The accused–appellant,A.C. Narayanan challenged the common

order dated 29th November, 2000 passed by the Additional Chief

Metropolitan Magistrate, 9th Court, Bandra, Mumbai (hereinafter

referred to as the, ‘Trial Court’) by filing applications u/s 482

Digitally signed by

Neeta Sapra

Date: 2015.01.28

16:10:11 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the High Court.

By the said common order the applications preferred by the

appellant-A.C.Narayanan for discharge/recalling process against

him was rejected by the Trial Court. The High Court by impugned

judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top