DALVEER BHANDARI,K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN, , ,
SIDDHARAM SATLINGAPPA MHETRE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA . – Respondent
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2271 2010.
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.7615 of 2009)
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre
…..Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Others
…..Respondents
J U D G M E N T
Dalveer Bhandari, J.
1.
Leave granted.
2.
This appeal involves issues of great public importance
pertaining to the importance of individual’s personal liberty and
the society’s interest.
3.
The society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail
because every criminal offence is the offence against the State.
The order granting or refusing bail must reflect perfect balance
between the conflicting interests, namely, sanctity of individual
liberty and the interest of the society. The law of bails dovetails
two conflicting interests namely, on the one hand, the
requirements of shielding the society from the hazards of those
committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the same crime
while on bail and on the other hand absolute adherence of the
fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence regarding
presumption of innocence of an accused until he is found guilty
and t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.