SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.Y. EQBAL,PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
SANJAY – Respondent


Advocates:
ANIL KATIYARR. C. KAUSHIK

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 499 OF 2011

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI … Appellant(s)

Versus

SANJAY

… Respondent(s)

with

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2105 OF 2013

JAYSUKH BAVANJI SHINGALIA

… Appellant(s)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER … Respondent(s)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2108-2112 of 2013

MALABHAI SHALABHAI RABARI AND OTHERS … Appellant(s)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS

Respondent(s)

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2107 of 2013

KALUBHAI DULABHAI KHACHAR … Appellant(s)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER … Respondent(s)

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2106 of 2013

SONDABHAI HANUBHAI BHARWAD … Appellant(s)

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER … Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

M.Y.EQBAL, J.

1.

The principal question which arises for consideration in

these appeals is whether the provisions contained in Sections

21, 22 and other sections of Mines and Minerals (Development

and Regulation) Act, 1957 operate as bar against prosecution

of a person who has been charged with allegation which

const

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top