SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

UMA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
MUNNA PANDEY – Respondent


Advocates:
AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEY

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).32229/2014

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16/07/2014

in SA No.255/2008 passed by the High Court Of Patna)

UMA PANDEY AND ANR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MUNNA PANDEY AND ORS Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for directions and interim relief and office

report)

Date : 25/11/2016 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey,Adv.

Ms. Anjul Dwivedi, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

As per office report dated 22.11.2016, service of notice is

complete on all the respondents but nobody has put in appearance on

their behalf.

Office to list the matter on a non-miscellaneous day.

In the me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top