SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

AFTAB ALAM,RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
PARAMJEET BATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND . – Respondent


Advocates:
(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTAABHISHEK ATREY

Page 1

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2069 OF 2012

(ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO. 7720 OF 2011)

PARAMJEET BATRA

APPELLANT

Versus

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.

RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

Leave granted.

2.

The appellant, respondents 3, 4 an one Rajpal are the

accused in Criminal Case No. 723 of 2005 (charge-sheet No.

32/2005) pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate,

Khatima, District Udham Singh Nagar. Respondent 2 is the

complainant. The appellant and respondents 3 and 4 filed a

petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure

(for short “the Code”) in the High Court of Uttarakhand at

Nainital for quashing of the above mentioned proceedings

and for quashing of the order of cognizance dated

Page 2

JUDGMENT

22/3/2005 passed thereon by the Judicial Magistrate,

Khatima against the appellant and the other accused for the

offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468,

471, 447, 448 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code

(for short “the IPC”). By order dated 29/09/2011

Uttarakhand High Court dismissed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top