SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KAILASH MANGAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH CHAND(DEAD)TH.LEGAL REPRESENTATIV – Respondent


Advocates:
S. NARAIN & CO.(MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 240 OF 2015

(Arising out of SLP (CRL.) NO.1887/2011)

KAILASH MANGAL

... APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

RAMESH CHAND (D) TH. LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE ...RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

2.

Challenging the correctness of the judgment in

Criminal Appeal No. 336-SBA of 2008 dated 14.10.2010, in and

by which, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh,

convicted the appellant under Sections 193 and 419 of the

Indian Penal Code, the appellant has preferred this appeal.

3.

Brief facts in nutshell are that the appellant and

the respondent are real brothers. One Surinder Kumar, who

is the maternal uncle of the appellant, has filed Civil Suit

No. 181 of 1987 against his sister Smt. Champa Devi and

others on 01.10.1987, interalia praying for a declaration

that he is the owner of a shop being No. 108, Ward 1, Old

Mandi, Tohana, to the exclusion of his sister. During the

pendency of the suit, Champa Devi, the mother of the

appellant and the respondent passed away on 14.07.1990.

Digitally signed by

Vinod Kumar

Date: 2015.02.05

15:36:02 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top