SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
DIGAMBAR – Respondent


Advocates:
NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

ITEM NO.41 COURT NO.10 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 32863/2017

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-08-2017

in WP No. 2056/2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at

Bombay at Nagpur)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

DIGAMBAR Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R.)

Date : 04-12-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

For Petitioner(s)

Mr.Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Heard.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are

not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed

by the High Court.

The special leave petition is dismissed.

(Ashok Raj Singh)

(Jagdish Chander)

Court Master

Court Master

Dig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top