BASALINGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
MUDIBASAPPA – Respondent
The legal point held in this case is that the court issued a direction to the petitioner to deposit the amount in question in the trial court within six weeks. Upon depositing the amount, there was a stay of recovery granted, and the deposited amount was to be kept in fixed deposit by the trial court (!) (!) (!) .
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.4 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8641/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04-07-2018
in CRLA No. 200042/2015 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At
Kalaburagi)
BASALINGAPPA Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
MUDIBASAPPA Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. )
Date : 26-10-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. S. N. Bhat, AOR
Mr. Priyank Jain, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
Issue notice, returnable in six weeks.
On depositing the amount in question in the Trial Court within
six weeks from today there shall be stay of recovery. The amount
so deposited shall be kept in Fixed Deposit by the Trial Court.
(ASHWANI THAKUR) (RAJIN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.