SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAYAKANTHAM – Appellant
Versus
ABAYKUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
K. V. MOHAN

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO .3049 OF 2017

[Arising out of SLP (C) No. 32285 of 2015]

JAYAKANTHAM & OTHERS

.....APPELLANTS

Versus

ABAYKUMAR

.....RESPONDENT

J U D G M E N T

Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J

Leave granted

2

This appeal arises from a judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge

of the Madras High Court on 11 June 2015 in a second appeal under Section

100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Dismissing the second appeal, the

learned Single Judge confirmed the judgment of the Principal District Judge,

Villupuram by which an appeal against the judgment of the sub-Judge,

Kallakurichi was dismissed. The trial court decreed the suit for specific

performance instituted by the respondent against the appellants.

Digitally signed by

PARVEEN KUMAR

Date: 2017.02.21

17:15:31 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

3

The subject matter of the suit for specific performance is a property

bearing survey No. 314/1A at Kallakurichi village admeasuring 735 square feet

upon which a residential house is situated. An agreement to sell was entered

into between the appellants and the father o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top