SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT,D.K. JAIN
PHULIA TUDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR (NOW JHARKHAND) – Respondent


Advocates:
APARNA JHAMANISH KUMAR SARAN

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 6

CASE NO.:

Appeal (crl.) 1221 of 2007

PETITIONER:

Phulia Tudu and Anr

RESPONDENT:

The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand)

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/09/2007

BENCH:

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT & D.K. JAIN

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1221 OF 2007

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.5396 of 2006)

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a

Division Bench of the Jharkhand High Court upholding

conviction of the appellants for offence punishable under

Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860 (in short the ’IPC’).

3. Background facts according to the prosecution in a

nutshell are as follows:

Bitia Soren (PW-8) is the sister-in-law of Biti Murmu

(hereinafter referred to as ’the deceased’). The first appellant’s

son fell ill and the appellants/accused were under the

impression that since the deceased, Biti Murmu, is a witch,

she has caused a spell on the son of the accused and,

therefore, they were nurturing a grievance against the

deceased. On the date of incident, when the villagers had gone

to the cremation ground to cremate the dead

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top