SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIPIN SAHNI – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


Advocates:
ABHAY KUMAR

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

INHERENT JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL)NO.144 OF 2018

IN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.224 OF 2018

VIPIN SAHNI AND ANR.

...Petitioners

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

...Respondent

O R D E R

Application for permission for open court hearing of the

review petition is rejected.

We have carefully gone through the review petition and the

connected papers. However, we do not find any merit in the review

petition. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.

...........................J.

[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]

...........................J.

[UDAY UMESH LALIT]

NEW DELHI;

APRIL 3, 2018.

Digitally signed by

MAHABIR SINGH

Date: 2018.04.04

17:13:34 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.1002 SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

R.P.(Crl.) No. 144/2018 in Crl.A. No. 224/2018

VIPIN SAHNI & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s)

Date : 03-04-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top