SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THAKKAR,M.P. (J)
AZHAR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
RAJIV GANDHI – Respondent


Advocates:

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 27

PETITIONER:

AZHAR HUSSAIN

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

RAJIV GANDHI

DATE OF JUDGMENT25/04/1986

BENCH:

THAKKAR, M.P. (J)

BENCH:

THAKKAR, M.P. (J)

VENKATARAMIAH, E.S. (J)

CITATION:

1986 AIR 1253 1986 SCR (2) 782

1986 SCC Supl. 315 1986 SCALE (1)573

CITATOR INFO :

R 1987 SC1577 (4,10,28)

R 1987 SC1926 (4)

F 1990 SC 924 (29)

R 1990 SC1731 (9,10)

ACT:

Representation of the People Act, 1951 :

Section 80 to 83, 86 & 87 - Election Petition -

Mandatory requirement to furnish material facts and

particulars - Non compliance - Summary dismissal of election

petition - What are material particulars to be incorporated

in an Election Petition.

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Order 6 Rule 16 and Order

7 Rule 11(a) - Election Petition - Applicability of.

HEADNOTE:

The respondent having secured the highest votes in the

1984 general elections was declared elected as a Member of

the Lok Sabha from the Amethi Constituency of Uttar Pradesh.

On the last date for challenging the election, the

appellant, an elector from that constituenc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top