SAIKIA,K.N. (J)
PROVASH CHANDRA DALUI & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
BISWANATH BANERJEE & ANR. – Respondent
PETITIONER:
PROVASH CHANDRA DALUI & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
BISWANATH BANERJEE & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT03/04/1989 BENCH:
SAIKIA, K.N. (J)
BENCH:
SAIKIA, K.N. (J)
OZA, G.L. (J)
CITATION:
1989 AIR 1834 1989 SCR (2) 401
1989 SCC Supl. (1) 487 JT 1989 Supl. 92
1989 SCALE (1)844 ACT:
Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949: Section 2(5)(b), Thika tenant: if stated period of tenancy less than 12 years and not otherwise.
Indian Contract Act, 1872---Contract--To be construed with reference to object and whole of its terms--’Ex antece- dentibus et consequentibus’ circumstances surrounding crea- tion and subject matter which it was designed to apply to should be taken into account.
Indian Evidence Act, 1872: Section 115--Estoppel and waiver-Distinction between--Voluntary choice essence of waiver.
Words and Phrases: ’extension’--’Renewal’---Dis-
tinction between.
HEADNOTE:
The second respondent, who is the predecessor in inter-
est of the first respondent, had on. 26th September, 1946 leased out the land in dispute to the appellant at the first instance for a period Of 10 years. The lease however provid- ed to the lessee/appellants option of extension at enhanced rent, twice for successive periods of 5 years, and a third op
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.