SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAMASWAMY,K.
SARVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DALIP SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
S. C. PATEL

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 3

PETITIONER:

SARVINDER SINGH

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

DALIP SINGH & ORS.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/08/1996

BENCH:

RAMASWAMY, K.

BENCH:

RAMASWAMY, K.

G.B. PATTANAIK (J)

CITATION:

1996 SCALE (6)59

ACT:

HEADNOTE:

JUDGMENT:

THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 1996

Present:

Hon’ble Mr.Justice K.Ramaswamy

Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.B.Pattanaik

R.K.Kapoor, P.Verma, S.K.Srivastava B.R.Kapoor and

S.C.Patel, Advs. for the appellant

Mrs. Rekha Palli, Adv. for the Respondents.

O R D E R

Sarvinder Singh

V.

Dalip Singh & Ors.

O R D E R

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

The admitted facts are that the appellant filed suit

Case No. 253-1 before the Sub-Judge, Ferozepur for

declaration that he is the owner of the property on the

basis of a registered Will dated May 26, 1952 executed by

his mother Smt. Hira Devi and that a declaration to that

effect was already given by the civil Court in another

decree dated March 29, 1974. He filed an application under

Order 39, Rule 11 CPC for ad interim injunction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top