VENKATACHALLIAH,M.N. (J)
JAGDISH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NATTHU SINGH – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 10
PETITIONER:
JAGDISH SINGH
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
NATTHU SINGH
DATE OF JUDGMENT25/11/1991
BENCH:
VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J)
BENCH:
VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J)
AGRAWAL, S.C. (J)
CITATION:
1992 AIR 1604 1991 SCR Supl. (2) 567
1992 SCC (1) 647 1991 SCALE (2)1363
ACT:
Specific Relief Act, 1963: Section 21 (2), (4) &
(5)---Proviso.
Suit for specific performance--Acquisition of suit
properties during the pendency of second appeal--Effect
of--Nature of relief available to plaintiff--Power of Court
to grant compensation--Held where the contract becomes
impossible of performance for no fault of
plaintiff-----Court can award compensation in lieu and
substitution of specific performance--Measure of compensa-
tions by the standards of Section 73 of the Contract
Act--Scope of the Proviso explained--Distinction between
Indian Law and English law discussed.
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 100
Second Appeal--High Court--Power to reappreciate evi-
dence and disturb concurrent findings of fact----Held find-
ings of fact vitiated by no
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.