S. RAJENDRA BABU,DORAISWAMY RAJU.
N. ADITHAYAN – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 14
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 6965 of 1996
PETITIONER:
N. Adithayan
RESPONDENT:
The Travancore Devaswom Board & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/10/2002
BENCH:
S. Rajendra Babu & Doraiswamy Raju.
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
Raju, J.
The question that is sought to be raised in the appeal is as to
whether the appointment of a person, who is not a Malayala Brahmin,
as "Santhikaran" or Poojari (Priest) of the Temple in question
Kongorpilly Neerikode Siva Temple at Alangad Village in Ernakulam
District, Kerala State, is violative of the constitutional and statutory
rights of the appellant. A proper and effective answer to the same
would involve several vital issues of great constitutional, social and
public importance, having, to certain extent, religious overtones also.
The relevant facts, as disclosed from the pleadings, have to be
noticed for a proper understanding and appreciation of the questions
raised in this appeal. The appellant claims himself to be a Malayala
Brahmin by community and a worshipper of the Siva Temple in
question. The Administration of the Temple vests with Travancore
Devaswom Board, a statutory bod
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.