SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.P. SETHI,K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
A.V. MURTHY – Appellant
Versus
B.S. NAGABASAVANNA – Respondent


Advocates:
LALITA KAUSHIK

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 3

CASE NO.:

Appeal (crl.) 206 of 2002

PETITIONER:

A.V. MURTHY

Vs.

RESPONDENT:

B.S. NAGABASAVANNA

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/2002

BENCH:

R.P. Sethi & K.G. Balakrishnan

JUDGMENT:

K.G. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the order passed by a learned

Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka. The appellant herein

filed a complaint before the Magistrate alleging that the respondent

herein had committed an offence punishable under Section 138 of

the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [for short, "the Act"]. The

appellant alleged that he and his two friends had advanced a sum

of Rs.7.5 lakhs to the respondent about four years back

to enable him to start a petrol pump and that the

respondent did not pay back the said amount despite

repeated demands and finally at the request of the

appellant, on 30.3.1998 the respondent issued a cheque in

favour of the appellant. The appellant presented the cheque for

payment, but the cheque was dishonoured by the bank for the

reason "Account closed". Thereafter, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top