SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 229

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KONSORTIUM EXPRESS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EMBITION SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Dinesh ,Respondent Advocate: Kevin Wong Gia Meng,Vivian Siew

JUDGMENT

Saheran Suhendran:

Introduction

[1] This matter concerns a petition ("the Petition") to wind up the Respondent ("Embition") for failing to satisfy an adjudication decision under the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 ('CIPAA'). The Index hereof is as below.

Background Facts

[2] Pursuant to a Letter of Award dated 13 June 2018 ("LOA"), Embition appointed the Petitioner to carry out infrastructure works ("Works") in a project known as "Construction and Completion of Infrastructure Works for Cadangan Pembangunan (Guarded Community) on Lot 424, Mukim Ulu Kelang, Selangor Darul Ehsan" (the "Project"), see: Exhibit "CKL-1", Encl 21

[3] Embition claimed that the Works were delayed due to the Petitioner's breaches of the LOA. The Petitioner applied for extensions of time ("EOTs"), which were allowed by the project architect ("Architect"). The Architect also certified claims for variation orders ("VO Claims").

[4] Embition consistently disputed the VO Claims and the EOTs. The CIPAA Proceedings and the Arbitration.

[5] On 27 December 2022, the Petitioner made a claim against Embition for RM1,347,044.94 under s 5 of CIPAA. On 6 January 2023, Embition dispu


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top