SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 2536

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
KUMARAISEN SUBACHANDRAGOPAL – Appellant
Versus
PRABAGAR SEGADEVAN & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. alleged oppression concerning company operations. (Para 1)

[1] The 3rd Defendant is a registered company with a restaurant at the Hotel Grand Blue Wave, Lobby Level, 9R, Jalan Bukit Meldrum, 80300 Johor Bahru, Johore. The shareholders of the 3rd Defendant are the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant. Each owns 250,000 shares in the 3rd Defendant. The Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant are also directors of the 3rd Defendant together with the 2nd Defendant. The Plaintiff had several complaints about the 3rd Defendant. The Plaintiff claimed that these amounted to oppression. As such, this Originating Summons was filed invoking s 346 of the Companies Act 2016 . Although cited as parties and served, the 2nd and 3rd Defendants took no part in the proceedings and were not represented.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top