SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 128

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
TEY KIM SENG – Appellant
Versus
PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN OCTIVILLE CONDOMINIUM – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ong Chee Yong ,Respondent Advocate: Rachel Chacko Thomas Chacko

Table of Content
1. basis of appeal and background facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the Learned Magistrate given on 9 May 2019 that allowed the Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim by the Respondent/Plaintiff. The Appellant/Defendant is to pay the Respondent/Plaintiff the sum of RM40,959-66 at 30 April 2018 and an interest of 10% per annum to be calculated from 1 May 2018 until the full and final settlement.

Background Facts

[2] The Respondent/Plaintiff is the Management Corporation for the Condominium Octiville, Persiaran Seri Alam, 81570 Masai, Johor formed under the Strata Management Titles Act 2013.

[3] The Appellant/Defendant is the owner of a Unit known as A3-02-04, Topaz Block, and Octiville Condominium.

[4] On 18 June 2017, the Respondent/Plaintiff through its solicitors Messrs Tea, Kelvin Kang & Co sent a Letter of Demand dated 15 June 2017 to enclosing Form 20 dated 8 June 2017 under the Strata Management Act 2013 and Strata Management (Maintenance and Management Regulations 2015) to demand the outstanding sum of RM53,065-89 (as of 31 May 2017.).

[5] The Respondent/Defendant alleged that the Appellant/Defendant has failed, refused

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top