HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK KOTA KINABALU
JULIETTE LOH SEAN YAR – Appellant
Versus
TIMOTHY CHIO TZE KIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. injunction for children's relocation must prioritize welfare. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties dispute custody rights with implications for relocation. (Para 17 , 19 , 21) |
| 3. children's best interests dictate relocation possibilities. (Para 49 , 51) |
(Enclosure 77)
[1] This is an application by the Husband Petitioner/Respondent for injunctive reliefs under s 101 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (Act 164) and r 3 and 77 of the Divorce and Matrimonial Proceedings Rules 1980 for inter alia, the following orders:
1. An injunction be granted restraining and/or prohibiting the above named Petitioner, JULIETTE LOH SEAN YAR (NRIC NO.: 811008-05-5364) by herself, her servants, employees, agents and whomsoever acting for and on her behalf, and in whatever capacity, from taking and/or removing the following children, namely:
(a) ABIGAIL CHIO MENN LYNN (f) (NRIC No 091208-12-1482), born on 08 December 2009, and now almost 13 years old; and
(b) ABNER GERARD CHIO JUN HEE (m) (NRIC No 140112-12-1259), born on 12 January 2014, and now almost 9 years old;
out of Malaysia without the leave of the Court until further order, or until conclusion of the inter
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.