HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
GREAT EASTERN LIFE ASSURANCE (MALAYSIA) BHD – Appellant
Versus
POOBALAN RAJAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim revolves around alleged fraudulent insurance claims. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims focus on fraudulent actions by the defendant. (Para 7 , 17) |
| 3. court's determination on issues regarding stroke claims. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 29) |
| 4. medical evidence cited to disprove claims of stroke. (Para 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. evidence insufficiency against claims of stroke and its effects. (Para 35) |
[1] This is a writ action for various declaratory reliefs which essentially sought to nullify the insurance claims which were said to have been fraudulently made to the plaintiff by the defendant, and for the recovery of the insurance pay-out effected by the plaintiff to the defendant.
[2] Following the completion of trial, I ruled for the plaintiff and highlighted the key reasons for my decision. This judgment contains the full reasons for my decision.
Key Background Facts
The Policies, The Claim And The Pay-out
[3] The plaintiff is an approved insurance company. The defendant, a male individual, bought two insurance policies from the plaintiff. The total premiums payable for the first policy was RM9,895.10 and for the second policy, RM8,447.70. Both were for the basic assured sum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.