HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DATUK KASI KL PALANIAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
MENARA EMBUN SDN BHD & ORS AND ANOTHER CASE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of case context and suits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties involved in originating summons. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. reliefs sought by the plaintiff. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. salient facts about company structures. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
[1] This judgment concerns 2 suits - Originating Summons No WA 24-NCC-410-09/2017 (OS 410) and Originating Summons No WA-24 NCC-411-09/2017 (OS 411). OS 410 and OS 411 were filed by the same Plaintiff pursuant to s 346 of the Companies Act 2016 . The facts surrounding both the Originating Summons relate to similar series of facts.
[2] The Plaintiff has filed 2 separate applications to convert the 2 Originating Summons into writ actions. I have allowed the applications. These are the full reasons for my decision.
Introduction
[3] In OS 410, the parties are as follows:
a) the Plaintiff is Datuk Kasi K L Palaniappan (DK);
b) the Defendants are:
i) the 1st Defendant is Modern Eden Sdn Bhd ("Modern Eden")
ii) the 2nd Defendant is Tan Sri Datuk Haji Mustapha Kamal Haji Abu Bakar ("TS MK");
iii) the 3rd Defendant is Felina Tan Sri Datuk Haji Mustapha Kamal ("Felina") who is TS MK's daughter;
iv) the 4th Defendant is MKN Holdings Sdn Bhd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.