SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 1370

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
NIK JAMES FERRIE ARKITEK – Appellant
Versus
TENAGA GAGAH SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Ong Keh Keong ,Respondent Advocate: Ahmad A Usman

Table of Content
1. liquidators challenged the validity of multiple winding-up orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. chronological events leading to winding-up petitions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court discussed jurisdictional precedence in winding-up orders. (Para 19 , 24)
Lau Bee Lan J:

[1] The Liquidators, of Tenaga Gagah Sdn Bhd (In Liquidation) ('the Respondent Company'), Ler Cheng Chye and Lum Tuck Cheong have appealed against the Order of the Court made on 3 December 2014 dismissing the Liquidator's application with no order as to costs.

[2] The Liquidator's application dated 26 August 2014 (Encl 25) made pursuant to s 237(3) of the Companies Act 1965 is for the following prayers:

"1. That leave was required by Saik Siw Lai, Chang Chiong Hwa, Chung Mei Ping, Faridah Hanum Binti Mohd Yusoff, Tam Mee Foong, Lim Su Hua and Lai Min Wang under s 226(3) of the Companies Act 1965 to proceed on 8 August 2014 with Kuala Lumpur High Court Companies (Winding Up) No 28NCC-352-04/2014 as at that date a Winding Up Order against the Respondent has been made on 31 July 2014.

2. That this Honourable Court had no jurisdiction to make an order on 8 August 2014 to wind up the Respondent in Kuala Lumpur High Court Com

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top