Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
FOSTER WHEELER E & C (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD AND ANOTHER APPEAL – Appellant
Versus
ARKEMA THIOCHEMICALS SDN BHD AND ANOTH.... – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the adjudication and contract obligations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arkema's arguments for stay of enforcement. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. foster wheeler's rebuttal to stay application. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's interpretation of section 16 for stay application. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. discussion on alternative dispute resolution routing. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 6. clarification on the limit of stay applications under cipaa. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 7. legislative intent for adjudication provisions and enforcement. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 8. final ruling on the applications presented. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
Mary Lim Thiam Suan J:
Introduction
[1] Foster Wheeler E&C (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [Foster Wheeler] entered into a contract with Arkema Thiochemicals Sdn Bhd [Arkema] for the engineering, procurement and construction management services and equipment and material and supply related to the Lychee Project in Kertih, Terengganu, Malaysia [the said contract]. Under the said contract, Foster Wheeler is responsible for the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
