COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KAMUJA HARTAMAS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the plaintiff's claim and the appeal process. (Para 1 , 2) |
[1] The Plaintiff, Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad claimed against the First Defendant for the recovery of monies which was due and payable under the financing facilities granted by the Plaintiff. The Second and Third Defendants were sued as guarantors. After a full trial and before the learned High Court Judge proceeded to deliver her decision, the First Defendant paid the amount claimed by the Plaintiff. The learned High Court Judge then proceeded to decide only on the counterclaim of the First Defendant which Her Ladyship had dismissed. This appeal by the First Defendant emanates from the dismissal of the counterclaim.
[2] We have heard the appeal and had allowed the appeal of the First Defendant. We ordered for damages to be assessed by the Registrar at the High Court. We set out below our reasons for our decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.