ALMA NUDO ATENZA vs PP & ANOTHER APPEAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 MarsdenLR 73

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ALMA NUDO ATENZA – Appellant
Versus
PP & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Gopal Sri Ram,Srimurugan Alagan,Surjan Singh,R Kengadharan,Jamil Mohamed Shafie,Emily Wong,Magita Hari Mogan,Yasmeen Soh,How Li Nee,Nursyazwani Ilyana Iskandar Dzulkarnain,Hussein Akhtar,Sathiswaranji Samy ,Respondent Advocate: Nik Suhaimi Nik Sulaiman,Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar,Ku Hayati Ku Haron,Hamdan Hamzah

Table of Content
1. the central issue pertains to constitutional validity under the federal constitution. (Para 1)

[1] The common and central issue in the present appeals is on the constitutional validity of s 37A of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (" DDA "), with reference to arts 5, 8, and 121 of the Federal Constitution ("FC").

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2019 MarsdenLR 73

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYAALMA NUDO ATENZA – AppellantVersusPP & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ALMA NUDO ATENZA – Appellant
Versus
PP & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent